[ITEM]
26.12.2018

Wilco Airbus A320 Fsx

8

Hi, IMO, the Aerosoft product is a fully featured quality product, with excellent system modelling, and great visual appeal, including great night lighting, though it is on/off, but considerably better than Wilco / FT very poor night lighting. The frame rates are very good, and it has an excellent and interactive spoken Captain / CoPilot system (similar to concept to Call, but much, much more detailed and far better). There seem to be an infinite number of AXE liveries too. The flight model is exceptionally stable; you simply point the AXE, and it absolutely stays put. It has a great fuel planner, and route editor (non Aerosoft). The only (minor) issue is inconsistent v-speeds, but with TPC.EXE (freeware, search Google) you can check and revise speeds to suit your given conditions.

A very important consideration is Aerosoft 's future plans, specifically that A318/319 versions will be released later in 2013, with updated systems including weather and ground radars, and that these systems will be ported to the A329/321. Also, the forum here is very active indeed, and that is a key issue, not just for support but for help from knowledgable simmers and also as a knowledge base. I had a brief but happily short-lived excursion to the BBS, but I've broken away from that, and now I am now firmly back to a more civilised, professional, courteous, and substantial Aerosoft arena. Please consider this last piece of information wisely. Good luck, but really you have a choice of a single front runner.

Oh no, not the FSX WX radar argument again!;-) Personally, I'd rather have something than nothing; it's all a simulation anyway, even the rain, the clouds, the cb's, the turbulence, the navaids, the scenery, the hills. If you don't want It, switch it off; if you want it, switch it on.

Mine is on, and that's my choice. Zbrush 4r5 free download full version. There now, what an easy solution to this sim schism. This is not an pro/contra argumentation about the WX radar, it was just to clarify that it does not work correctly though it is implemented in the Wilco and will be implemented in the AAX. I fully understand if this is a topic I may not be allowed to discuss here. So please shut the topic if I offend here.

I have used the Wilco Airbus Vol.1 when distributed by both FeelThere and JustFlight (seems to be identical). In FSX the A320 flies with a nose.

I have both versions from Wilco for the Airbus and would like to know how their product (version 1 of course) compares to this release by Aerosoft. Sherrilyn kenyon website. If the consensus is the release by Aerosoft is the better product please let me know why so I can spend some money. Many thanks and kind regards as always. With version 1.1 of the AAX there is, IMO, very little left to say in favour of the Wilco/FT busses: W/FT have coded the MCDU to a greater degree and depth than in the AAX, but that doesn't change my overall decision: With the copilot/spoken checklists, the graphics, the wide-screen support, pre-defined panel states, user-defined panel state-saving, included RAAS, future enhancements as free updates (wx radar, terrain on ND), it was an easy decision for me to finally 'ground' my W/FT busses. If you want an Airbus that's better than the AAX you'll have to wait for the one by FSL - but it's much more fun if you can fly the AAX while you're waiting!!! Ok OK you win.

[/ITEM]
[/MAIN]
26.12.2018

Wilco Airbus A320 Fsx

73

Hi, IMO, the Aerosoft product is a fully featured quality product, with excellent system modelling, and great visual appeal, including great night lighting, though it is on/off, but considerably better than Wilco / FT very poor night lighting. The frame rates are very good, and it has an excellent and interactive spoken Captain / CoPilot system (similar to concept to Call, but much, much more detailed and far better). There seem to be an infinite number of AXE liveries too. The flight model is exceptionally stable; you simply point the AXE, and it absolutely stays put. It has a great fuel planner, and route editor (non Aerosoft). The only (minor) issue is inconsistent v-speeds, but with TPC.EXE (freeware, search Google) you can check and revise speeds to suit your given conditions.

A very important consideration is Aerosoft 's future plans, specifically that A318/319 versions will be released later in 2013, with updated systems including weather and ground radars, and that these systems will be ported to the A329/321. Also, the forum here is very active indeed, and that is a key issue, not just for support but for help from knowledgable simmers and also as a knowledge base. I had a brief but happily short-lived excursion to the BBS, but I've broken away from that, and now I am now firmly back to a more civilised, professional, courteous, and substantial Aerosoft arena. Please consider this last piece of information wisely. Good luck, but really you have a choice of a single front runner.

Oh no, not the FSX WX radar argument again!;-) Personally, I'd rather have something than nothing; it's all a simulation anyway, even the rain, the clouds, the cb's, the turbulence, the navaids, the scenery, the hills. If you don't want It, switch it off; if you want it, switch it on.

Mine is on, and that's my choice. Zbrush 4r5 free download full version. There now, what an easy solution to this sim schism. This is not an pro/contra argumentation about the WX radar, it was just to clarify that it does not work correctly though it is implemented in the Wilco and will be implemented in the AAX. I fully understand if this is a topic I may not be allowed to discuss here. So please shut the topic if I offend here.

I have used the Wilco Airbus Vol.1 when distributed by both FeelThere and JustFlight (seems to be identical). In FSX the A320 flies with a nose.

I have both versions from Wilco for the Airbus and would like to know how their product (version 1 of course) compares to this release by Aerosoft. Sherrilyn kenyon website. If the consensus is the release by Aerosoft is the better product please let me know why so I can spend some money. Many thanks and kind regards as always. With version 1.1 of the AAX there is, IMO, very little left to say in favour of the Wilco/FT busses: W/FT have coded the MCDU to a greater degree and depth than in the AAX, but that doesn't change my overall decision: With the copilot/spoken checklists, the graphics, the wide-screen support, pre-defined panel states, user-defined panel state-saving, included RAAS, future enhancements as free updates (wx radar, terrain on ND), it was an easy decision for me to finally 'ground' my W/FT busses. If you want an Airbus that's better than the AAX you'll have to wait for the one by FSL - but it's much more fun if you can fly the AAX while you're waiting!!! Ok OK you win.